About Me

Name: Shaun Pierce
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Vist My Primary Blog

History Repeats - Remaking the Democrats of 72'

By Shaun Pierce

My father sent me an interesting tidbit of information. Since I was busy being born in 1972, I wasn't really following politics much. But he brought up the idea if you look at the "1972 Democratic Convention" you find something that looks like it's the script from today's newscast. Only the names have changed.

In 1972, new quotas mandated that certain percentages of delegates be women or members of minority groups. Also taking center stage of debates for the first time were abortion and gay rights. 36 years have gone by and it seems we really have not moved an inch.

36 years ago new rules for choosing and seating delegates created an unusual number of rules and credentials challenges. Sound familiar?

Back then South Dakota senator George McGovern had amassed the most delegates to the convention by using a grass roots campaign that was powered by opposition to the Vietnam War.
Now Senator Barack Obama is amassing delegates by using a grass roots campaign powered by opposition to the Iraq War.
Back then many traditional Democratic leaders and politicians felt that McGovern's delegate count did not reflect the wishes of most Democratic voters. Kind of like the infighting that we see going on now.

Back then Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter helped to spearhead a "Stop McGovern" campaign. The stop-McGovern forces tried unsuccessfully to alter the delegate composition of the California delegation. California had a "winner-take-all" primary format, which was contrary to the delegate selection rules. So even though McGovern only won the California primary by a 5% electoral margin, he won all 273 of their delegates to the convention.

The anti-McGovern group argued for a more proportional distribution of the delegates, while the McGovern forces stressed that the rules for the delegate selection had been set and the Stop McGovern alliance was trying to change the rules after the game. Hello Florida and Michigan!

Can someone tell me what year this is? Now I feel like Marty McFly watching the news. Just this morning on CNBC they interviewed a financial analyst who proudly wore on his lapel a large "WIN" button circa 1974. That stands for Whip Inflation Now (WIN) and was an attempt to to combat inflation, by encouraging personal savings and disciplined spending habits in combination with public measures, urged by U.S. President Gerald Ford.

It amazing with all the slick language of "Change" and "Progressiveness" you could still put on a pair of bell bottoms and be in political style. Maybe McGovern will win this time.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Same Sex Sermon

By Shaun Pierce

It's always been puzzling to me how two people can read the same thing and come up with two very different meanings. Take for instance the Sermon on the Mount given by Jesus. I have read that several times and never once did I grasp that he was addressing the issue of same sex unions. Maybe there are even veiled references to drilling in Anartica, and Wal Mart holding dominion over pagans.

On the campaign trail in Ohio, Sen. Barack Obama defended his support of abortion and same-sex unions. That's too be expected. The man is entitled to his opinion and his vote. It's how he chose to build his defense that is disturbing.

In response to a question, Obama said he does not support calling same-sex unions marriage, but thinks same-sex couples should be given the recognition and benefits granted to married couples. Maybe we call it "Deirram". It's married backwards. It will mean the same thing but have a different word. Kind of like "liberal" and "progressive".

Obama said: "I think that it is a legal right that they [homosexuals] should have that is recognized by the state. If people find that controversial then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount, which I think is, in my mind, for my faith, more central than an obscure passage in Romans."

Yeah, let's just toss that second rate Romans thing out. I mean heck, how many Romans are there in America anyway? He is not running for president of Rome, so let's not waste time with such things.

Jesus teaches on a number of issues central to the Christian life in the Sermon on the Mount. I've read it over and over again. I see the part about being witnesses to the world, loving our enemies, honoring marriage. Still as hard I try, even if I hold the pages up to the light and look at them upside down, I find no instruction on same-sex unions.

As for St. Paul's writing in Romans, it is distinguished not by its obscurity but by its clarity and consistency with all of Christian teaching about the nature of sexuality and marriage.

Paul writes: "They [the unrighteous] exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator - who is forever praised. Amen. Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion." (Romans 1:24-27, NIV)

Somebody dig Romans out of the trash please. We might need it after all!

Obama also told the crowd that his support of abortion (he voted against banning partial-birth abortion, and against notifying the parents of minors prior to their having an abortion) and his support of same-sex unions do not make him "less of a Christian."

He is right. A vote doesn't make anyone less of a Christian. However, total ignorance of Scripture and the basic understanding of the value of human life certainly does permit one to question Obama's theology came from the back of a cereal box?

If you don't want to be a Christian that's fine. Support gay marriage, support the killing of children, be an advocate for gay causes, calling for higher taxes, a socialist health care system, tell the people what you really think.

The political activism of Christians has been noticed and the wolves are out shopping for clothes. Candidates now assume either be or appear to be Christian to have any change of actually being elected anymore. Candidates create there own version of "Christianity" that fits them and their ideas and hope to pass it off to shallow believers.

If you believe that the Sermon on the Mount was speech given by Jesus in support of same sex unions then Barack is your man. "A great ignorance did sweep across the earth. Behold, with a smile the savior led them to the promised land. It was not what anyone had envisioned and the people cried out, what the heck were we thinking?" - A reading from the book of Obama

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »